Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tessi
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tessi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The sources were either brief coverage of news events such as acquisitions plus two that were pretty clearly posting of their press releases/ self descriptions. North8000 (talk) 21:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Management, Technology, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as spam. Draftifying would still be on the table, but the creator is blocked now. Suitskvarts (talk) 09:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.